Coaching Professional Qualification Ltd – United Kingdom
CPQ-ASMT-2026-v1.0 · CPQ™ INSTITUTIONAL STANDARD

CPQ-T Credential Assessment Rubric

Standard rubric for assessing sessions and evidence with pass rules and critical-fail protections

External Review Draftv1.0Issued 2026-08-16Review 2026-11-16
External Review DraftNumeric or procedural requirements not fixed in the original source materials remain proposed CPQ™ policy until formally adopted.

1. Assessment Principle

Document basis: CPQ institutional files and diploma cards, Discover Your Professional Path in Coaching, Ethics of Coaching Law, and CPQ's published professional content. New numeric or procedural requirements not already fixed in the source materials are presented as proposed CPQ internal policy for external review, not as a claim of recognition or equivalence by another body.

Assessment evaluates what the practitioner actually does, not marketing polish or memorised definitions. Assessors should be materially independent from conflicts of interest wherever practicable.

2. Rubric Weights

DomainWeightTypical Evidence
C01 Ethics & Scope20%Agreement, referral decision, confidentiality, conflicts
C03 Contracting & Autonomy10%Session purpose, agreement review, client ownership
C04 Presence & Listening15%Client space, summaries, silence, language
C05 Inquiry & Awareness15%Non-leading questions, testing assumptions
C06 Action & Accountability15%Experiments, decisions, follow-up criteria
C07 Context & Inclusion10%Culture, organisation, accessibility
C02 Reflective Practice10%Self-review and supervision
C08 Evidence & Documentation5%Accurate records and continuing learning

3. Pass Thresholds

T1 = 70/100, T2 = 75/100, T3 = 80/100, T4 = 85/100. In addition to total score, at least 60% is required in C01 and there must be no Critical Fail.

4. Critical Fail

Includes: clear safety breach, unauthorised diagnosis/treatment, exploitation, falsified evidence, deliberate unjustified confidentiality disclosure, or ignoring an evident serious risk. Assessment stops and the matter is referred for appropriate decision.

5. Reassessment

An unsuccessful candidate receives a summary of strengths and development areas and may reassess after a recommended development period. Assessors do not disclose confidential third-party information or protected assessment materials.

CPQ™ · Institutional Review Centre

Review the complete pack or return to the organization hub